Articles dans des revues à comité de lecture

  • Nozari, N., Pinet, S., & Muylle, M. (2026). What can typing tell us about language production? Annual Review of Linguistics, 12, 209–226. doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-041824034740.
  • Pinet, S., Zielinski, C., Alario, F.-X., & Longcamp, M. (2026). On the acquisition of typing skills without formal training by school-aged children. Reading and Writing, 39, 485–513. doi: 10.1007/s11145-025-10736-7
  • Corneyllie, A., Walters, T., Dubarry, A.-S., He, X., Hinault, T., Ković, V., Medani, T., Pascarella, A., Pinet, S., Ruzzoli, M., Schaworonkow, N., Šoškić, A., Stekić, K., Tsilimparis, K., Ulloa, J. L., Wang, R., & Chaumon, M. (2025). Doing conferences differently: A decentralised multi-hub approach for ecological and social sustainability. PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, 4(6), e0000177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000177
  • Pinet, S. (2025). The missing link between response selection and execution in language production. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 74, 101246. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2025.101246 Special issue “Action monitoring: from movements to words”.
  • Weiss, D., Pinet, S., & Kapnoula, E. (in principle acceptance). Does co-activating familiar words help L2 word learning?” Journal of Cognition. Registered report.
  • Pinet, S., & Martin, C.D. (2025). Cross-modal interactions in language production: evidence from word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 32, 452-462. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02552-x
  • Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2023). Different electrophysiological signatures of similarity-induced and Stroop-like interference in language production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1-21. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02014
  • Pinet, S., Zielinski, C., Longcamp, M., & Alario, F.-X (2022). Typing expertise in a large student population. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7, 77. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00424-3
  • Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2022). Correction Without Consciousness in Complex Tasks: Evidence from Typing. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 11. doi: 10.5334/joc.202
  • Riès, S., Pinet, S., Nozari, N., & Knight, R. (2021). Overcoming the challenges of electrophysiological recordings in sequential speech production. Psychophysiology, 58(5). doi: 10.1111/psyp.13788
  • Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2021). The role of visual feedback in detecting and correcting typing errors: A signal detection approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 117, 104193. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104193
  • Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2020). Electrophysiological correlates of monitoring in typing with and without visual feedback. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(4), 603–620. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01500
  • Nozari, N., & Pinet, S. (2020). A critical review of the behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological studies of co-activation of representations during word production. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 53. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100875
  • Pinet, S., Dell, G., & Alario, F.-X. (2019). Tracking Keystroke Sequences at the Cortical Level Reveals the Dynamics of Serial Order Production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(7), 1030–1043. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01401
  • Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2018). "Twisting fingers": the case for interactivity in typed language production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25-4, 1449-1457.doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1452-7
  • Fargier, R., Bürki, A., Pinet, S., Alario, F.-X., & Laganaro, M. (2018). Word onset phonetic properties and motor artefacts in speech production EEG recordings. Psychophysiology, 55(2), e12982. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12982
  • Scaltritti, M., Pinet, S., Longcamp, M., & Alario, F.-X. (2017). The functional relationship between language and motor processing in typewriting: An EEG study. Language and Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(9), 1086–1101. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1283427
  • Pinet, S., Zielinski, C., Mathôt, S., Dufau, S., Alario, F.-X., & Longcamp, M. (2017). Measuring sequences of keystrokes with jsPsych: reliability of response times and interkeystroke intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1163–1176. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0776-3  (Erratum published in 2017, doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0865-y)
  • Pinet, S., Dubarry, A.-S., & Alario, F.-X. (2016). Response retrieval and motor planning during typing. Brain & Language, 159, 74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.012
  • Pinet, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Alario, F.-X. (2016). Typing is writing: linguistic properties modulate typing execution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1898–1906. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1044-3
  • Valente, A., Pinet, S., Laganaro, M., & Alario, F.-X. (2016). “When” does picture naming take longer than word reading? Frontiers in Psychology. 7:31. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00031
  • Pinet, S., Hamamé, C. M., Longcamp, M., Vidal, F., & Alario, F.-X. (2015). Response planning in word typing: Evidence for inhibition. Psychophysiology, 52(4), 524–531. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12373

 

Chapitre d'ouvrage

  • Pinet, S. (2025). Du stylo au clavier d’ordinateur. In Connan, J.-F., Danna, J., & Jover, M. (Eds.). Ecrire à l’ère du numérique : Apprentissage, Évaluation et Rééducation. De Boeck

 

Commentaires

  • Pinet, S., & Longcamp, M. Commentary: Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: a high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology-Educational Psychology. 15:1517235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1517235
  • Pinet, S. & Fargier R. (2016). Commentary: Oscillatory Neuronal Activity Reflects Lexical-Semantic Feature Integration within and across Sensory Modalities in Distributed Cortical Networks. Frontiers in Psychology. 6:2005. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02005

 

Actes de conférences (à comité de lecture)

  • Pinet, S. (2024). What are you looking at? Beyond typing speed and formal training for assessing typing expertise. In L. K. Samuelson, S. L. Frank, M. Toneva, A. Mackey, & E. Hazeltine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 46th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society
  • Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2020). Using Signal Detection Theory to Investigate the Role of Visual Information in Performance Monitoring in Typing. In S. Denison, M. Mack, Y. Xu, & B.C. Armstrong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Hepner, C., Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2018). An enhanced model of gemination in spelling: Evidence from a large corpus of typing errors. In C. Kalish, M. Rau, J. Zhu, & T. Rogers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.